Comparison of Black Soldier Fly (BSF) Maggot Nutrition with Different Culture Media

Authors

  • Nurhayati Department of Fisheries Resources Utilization, Faculty of Marine and Fisheries, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
  • Novita Sari Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, Abulyatama University, Aceh Besar
  • Said Muhazzir Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, Abulyatama University, Aceh Besar
  • Lia Handayani Department of Fisheries Product Technology, Faculty of Fisheries, Abulyatama University, Aceh Besar
  • Ismarica Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Marine and Fisheries, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
  • Maretty Twentyna Dolorosa Department of Fisheries Resources Utilization, Faculty of Marine and Fisheries, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
  • Ivonda Vicana Pandang Department of Fisheries Resources Utilization, Faculty of Marine and Fisheries, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
  • Hengki Pradana Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Marine and Fisheries, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh
  • Muhammad Riandi Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Marine and Fisheries, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61579/sagita.v2i3.222

Keywords:

Maggot, nutritional value, protein

Abstract

Maggot Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) is one of the natural feeds widely used by fish farmers. Maggot has a high nutritional content so that it is in great demand by the community. This study aims to determine the nutritional value contained in maggot cultured using different culture media. The culture media used in this study include fermentation of tofu waste and fermentation of fish waste. Fermentation of culture media was carried out for 7 days using EM4, sugar and water. The parameters analyzed in this study included protein content, fat content, water content, ash content and carbohydrates. The results showed that maggots cultured using fish waste fermentation culture media had a higher protein content compared to tofu waste fermentation culture media. The nutritional value of the fish waste fermentation treatment was 33.94% protein, 8.13% moisture content, 2.85% ash content, 3.31% fat and 51.16% carbohydrate.

References

Ajani, E. K., Nwanna, L. C., & Musa, B. O. (2004). Replacement of Fishmeal with Maggot Meal in The Diets of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. World Aquaculture, 35(1), 52–54.

Akpodiete, O. J., Ologhobo, A. D., & Oluyemi, J. A. (1997). Production and Nutritive Value of Housefly Maggot Meal on Three Substrates of Poultry Faeces. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 12(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.1997.9706192

Anene, A., Afam-Anene, O. C., Ike, K., & Ekekwe, N. H. (2013). Preliminary Investigations on Quantity and Proximate Quality of Maggots Produced From Four Different Sources of Livestock Wastes. Journal of Research in Biology, 3(6), 1060–1065.

Aniebo, A. O., Erondu, E. S., & Owen, O. J. (2008). Proximate Composition of Housefly Larva ( Musca domestica ) Meal Generated From Mixture of Cattle Blood and Wheat Bran. 20(12).

Aniebo, A. O., & Owen, O. J. (2010). Effects of Age and Method of Drying on the Proximate Composition of Housefly Larvae (Musca domestica Linnaeus) Meal (HFLM). Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9(5), 485–487. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.485.487

AOAC. (1995). Official methods of analysis of The Associated of Analytical Chemists.

Azir, A., Harris, H., & Haris, R. B. K. (2017). Produksi dan Kandungan Nutrisi Maggot (Chrysomya Megacephala) Menggunakan Komposisi Media Kultur Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmu-IImu Perikanan Dan Budidaya Perairan, 12(1), 34–40.

Barroso, F. G., de Haro, C., Sánchez-Muros, M. J., Venegas, E., Martínez-Sánchez, A., & Pérez-Bañón, C. (2014). The potential of various insect species for use as food for fish. Aquaculture, 422–423, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.12.024

Dzepe, D., Nana, P., Tchuinkam, T., Meutchieye, F., Lontsi, M. D., Tchoumbou, M., & Kimpara, J. M. (2019). Production and Valorization of Maggot Meal : Sustainable Source of Proteins for Indigenous Chicks. Asian Journal of Research in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 3(3), 1–9.

Hussein, M., Pillai, V. V., Goddard, J. M., Park, H. G., Kothapalli, K. S., Ross, D. A., Ketterings, Q. M., Brenna, J. T., Milstein, M. B., Marquis, H., Johnson, P. A., Nyrop, J. P., & Selvaraj, V. (2017). Sustainable Production of Housefly (Musca Domestica) Larvae as a Protein-Rich Feed Ingredient by Utilizing Cattle Manure. PLoS ONE, 12(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171708

Hwangbo, J., Hong, E. C., Jang, A., Kang, H. K., Oh, J. S., Kim, B. W., & Park, B. S. (2009). Utilization of House Fly-Maggots, a Feed Supplement in the Production of Broiler Chickens. Journal of Environmental Biology, 30(4), 609–614.

K, A. E. A., & A., M. (2000). Use of Housefly Maggots as a Fishmeal Replacer in Tilapia Culture: A Recent Vogue in Nigeria. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Tilapia Aquaculture, Rio Dejaneiro, Brazil, 138–143.

Nur’aini, & Prawanto, A. (2021). The Effectiveness of Maggot (Hermetia Illucens) Growth in Various Growing Media. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v4i3.7155

Oonincx, D. G. A. B., Laurent, S., Veenenbos, M. E., & van Loon, J. J. A. (2020). Dietary enrichment of edible insects with omega 3 fatty acids. Insect Science, 27(3), 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12669

Pouomogne, V. (2008). Capture-Based Aquaculture of Clarias Catfish: Case Study of the Santchou Fishers in Western Cameroon. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 508, 93–108.

Rambet, V., Umboh, J. F., Tulung, Y. L. R., & Kowel, Y. H. S. (2015). Kecernaan Protein dan Energi Ransum Broiler Yang Menggunakan Tepung Maggot (Hermetia Illucens) Sebagai Pengganti Tepung Ikan. Zootec, 35(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.35792/zot.36.1.2016.9314

Downloads

Published

2024-10-19

How to Cite

Nurhayati, Novita Sari, Said Muhazzir, Lia Handayani, Ismarica, Dolorosa, M. T., … Riandi, M. (2024). Comparison of Black Soldier Fly (BSF) Maggot Nutrition with Different Culture Media. Sagita Academia Journal, 2(3), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.61579/sagita.v2i3.222