Local Cultural Identity and Social Cohesion among Youth in Multicultural Communities: An Integrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61579/kirana.v3i3.993Keywords:
cultural identity, social cohesion, youth, local culture, multicultural communitiesAbstract
Young people in multicultural communities negotiate cultural identity amid migration, globalization, and digital communication, yet the conditions under which local cultural identity strengthens rather than fragments social cohesion remain insufficiently theorized. This integrative review synthesized 38 sources on local cultural identity, social cohesion, intercultural interaction, and youth participation: 13 published between 2016 and 2026 and 25 foundational works from 1973 to 2015, of which six address Indonesia. Sources were selected purposively, without a formal screening log or quality appraisal, and analyzed through thematic synthesis. Four interrelated themes emerged: belonging, recognition, intercultural interaction, and participatory cultural practice. Comparison across sources suggests that local cultural identity supports cohesion when it provides continuity and attachment, is publicly recognized, and is enacted through cooperative activities with shared goals, and that it becomes exclusionary when cultural boundaries are treated as fixed. Indonesian cases from Maluku and Bali illustrate both outcomes, and diversity differs across regions. Young people act as cultural mediators, although digital visibility can simplify culture and intensify disputes over authenticity and ownership. The review proposes a conceptual, heuristic model linking recognition, belonging, participation, interaction, and mutual understanding under safeguards of inclusion and equal dignity. Evidence for the links is uneven, and the model requires empirical validation in varied multicultural settings. Recommendations for schools, communities, and local governments follow from the findings.
References
Ananta, A., Arifin, E. N., Hasbullah, M. S., Handayani, N. B., & Pramono, A. (2015). Demography of Indonesia's ethnicity. ISEAS Publishing.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2015, November 18). Mengulik data suku di Indonesia. https://www.bps.go.id/id/news/2015/11/18/127/mengulik-data-suku-di-indonesia.html
Banks, J. A. (2017). Failed citizenship and transformative civic education. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17726741
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Berry, J. W. (2017). Theories and models of acculturation. In S. J. Schwartz & J. B. Unger (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of acculturation and health. Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.09.017
Comaroff, J. L., & Comaroff, J. (2009). Ethnicity, Inc. University of Chicago Press.
Council of Europe. (2018). Reference framework of competences for democratic culture: Volume 1. Context, concepts and model. Council of Europe Publishing.
Cruz, M. T., & Miranda, M. (2022). Storytelling as media literacy and intercultural dialogue in post-colonial societies. Media and Communication, 10(4), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5814
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Multilingual Matters.
Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
Hefner, R. W. (Ed.). (2001). The politics of multiculturalism: Pluralism and citizenship in Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. University of Hawai’i Press.
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts (J. Anderson, Trans.). Polity Press.
Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & boyd, d. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era. Polity Press.
Lambert, J. (2013). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community (4th ed.). Routledge.
MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1086/225585
Malawat, R. S. (2026). The duality of Pela Gandong in the peace narrative in Maluku: Between local wisdom and hegemony. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.34050/jib.v14i2.52083
Mohareb, N., Selim, G., & El Samahy, E. (2022). Digital storytelling: Youth’s vision of Beirut’s contested heritage. Storytelling, Self, Society, 18(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/sss.2022.0005
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2009 tentang Kepemudaan.
Schiefer, D., & van der Noll, J. (2017). The essentials of social cohesion: A literature review. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
Soini, K., & Birkeland, I. (2014). Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum, 51, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001
Suryadinata, L., Arifin, E. N., & Ananta, A. (2003). Indonesia’s population: Ethnicity and religion in a changing political landscape. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
Tamatea, L. M. (2011). Ajeg Bali discourse: Globalisation, fear and othering – online. Asian Ethnicity, 12(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2011.571835
Taylor, C. (1994). The politics of recognition. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 25–73). Princeton University Press.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2021a). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2021b). Media and information literate citizens: Think critically, click wisely! UNESCO.
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
Vertovec, S. (2019). Talking around super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1406128
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maya Rahmawati, Ardiansyah Fikri, Nabila Khairunnisa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
