Institutional Setting Enhancement sebagai Solusi Peningkatan Active Learning Mahasiswa untuk Bentuk Pembelajaran Presentasi Kelas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61579/beujroh.v4i2.875Keywords:
institution, active learning, student participationAbstract
This community service aims to enhance the implementation of active learning among university students through an institutional setting enhancement approach in classroom learning. The method used is Participatory Action Research (PAR), where students actively participate as partners in implementing changes through the introduction of structured classroom rules designed to encourage active engagement. The activity was conducted in the Project Evaluation and Islamic Business course at the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Diponegoro, over eight weeks. Several issues were identified, including low student participation, presenters merely reading slides, and the use of smartphones to answer questions without adequate understanding of the material. To address these issues, a set of improved classroom rules was implemented to promote deeper engagement in presentations and discussions. The results indicate that the enhanced institutional setting significantly improved classroom interaction, presentation quality, and student participation during question-and-answer sessions. Statistical analysis using a one-way ANOVA test revealed a significant difference between the average active learning scores before and after the rule enhancement, with a p-value of 0.0042. These findings demonstrate that institutional setting enhancement effectively increases student engagement and improves academic performance
References
Aji, C. A., & Khan, M. J. (2019). The Impact of Active Learning on Students’ Academic Performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 07(03), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.73017
Argyriou, P., Benamar, K., & Nikolajeva, M. (2022). What to Blend? Exploring the Relationship Between Student Engagement and Academic Achievement via a Blended Learning Approach. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 21(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221091512
Black, K. (2010). Business Statistics for contemporary decision making (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Bonem, E. M., Fedesco, H. N., & Zissimopoulos, A. N. (2020). What you do is less important than how you do it: the effects of learning environment on student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 23(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09289-8
Costa, L. M. G., & Reis, M. J. C. S. (2025). Motivational Teaching Techniques in Secondary and Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Active Learning Methodologies. Digital, 5(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital5030040
Doolittle, P., Wojdak, K., & Walters, A. (2023). Defining Active Learning: A Restricted Systemic Review. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 11. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.25
Howell, R. A. (2021). Engaging students in education for sustainable development: The benefits of active learning, reflective practices and flipped classroom pedagogies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 325, 129318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129318
Imd. (2025). World Competitiveness Rangking. Https://Www.Imd.Org/Centers/Wcc/World-Competitiveness-Center/Rankings/World-Competitiveness-Ranking/Rankings/Wcr-Rankings/.
Kennedy, C., Kraemer, E. T., & Benson, L. C. (2021). Active Learning Techniques for Computing Education. In Preparing Pre-Service Teachers to Teach Computer Science: Models, Practices, and Policies (pp. 3–28). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-64802-458-020251003
Kimonen, E., Nevalainen, R., & Schoen, L. T. (2017). Active Learning for Educational Change. In Reforming Teaching and Teacher Education (pp. 225–252). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-917-1_9
LaDage, L. D., Tornello, S. L., Vallejera, J. M., Baker, E. E., Yan, Y., & Chowdhury, A. (2018). Variation in behavioral engagement during an active learning activity leads to differential knowledge gains in college students. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00150.2017
Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Oklevik, O. (2022). Exploring the relationship between active learning, student well-being, and student performance satisfaction: A student engagement perspective. Beta, 36(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18261/beta.36.1.7
Schell, J. A., & Butler, A. C. (2018). Insights From the Science of Learning Can Inform Evidence-Based Implementation of Peer Instruction. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00033
Schnitzler, K., Holzberger, D., & Seidel, T. (2021). All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 627–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00500-6
Shaik, M. G. (2025). Pedagogical approaches to collaborative learning: An analytical study. 050001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0248162
Shehla Khan, & Shagufta Iqbal. (2021). Innovative ways of student engagement for active learning in science courses of nursing in the four year baccalaureate program. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.308
Shivaramu, H. T., Aveen, K. P., & Ullal, V. N. (2025). The role of experiential learning in improving academic performance and student satisfaction in engineering education. Discover Education, 4(1), 545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01019-y
Skariah, T. A., Rao, U. K., & Karthika, M. (2025a). Active Learning in Respiratory Care Education: A Narrative Review. Health Professions Education, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.55890/2452-3011.1363
Skariah, T. A., Rao, U. K., & Karthika, M. (2025b). Active Learning in Respiratory Care Education: A Narrative Review. Health Professions Education, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.55890/2452-3011.1363
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 An’im Kafabih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
